Level 2 · Lesson 1

The case of two Chardonnays

9 min 48 secC09After Level 1
← All background chapters
Chapter 3 of 3

Build the hypothesis from independent clues

A deeper guide to build the hypothesis from independent clues, practice: same grape, controlled reveal.

The argument

What this chapter will give you

This chapter supports the lesson’s central job: use structure and fruit direction to form a broad climate hypothesis—without turning it into a verdict.

This is a reading chapter, not a definition enlarged to fill a screen. Its sections build the idea from mechanism and method to the language you can use in front of an actual glass.

01

Build the hypothesis from independent clues

Start with acidity, body, alcohol warmth, fruit direction, and ripeness character. If several point toward a similar growing pattern, form a broad hypothesis. Then actively list alternatives: vintage, elevation, early harvest, canopy, irrigation, acid adjustment, alcohol management, or oak. A good hypothesis includes the reason it might fail.

02

Practice: same grape, controlled reveal

Taste two examples of the same grape at similar temperatures. Rank structural features before seeing origin. Reveal only the broad climate information first and revise confidence. Reveal vintage and production information last. This sequence shows which clues came from the wine and which arrived with the story.

Bring it back to the glass

Three checks before the conclusion

  1. Record the sensory observation before proposing a grape, place, climate, or production cause.
  2. Compare intensity, timing, location, and persistence instead of relying on a single descriptor.
  3. State a plausible alternative and lower confidence when one clue is doing all the work.

The language bench

Solid things you can actually say

Use these as sentence shapes, not answers to copy. Replace the details with what your glass can defend.

Smell

What is actually aromatic?

  • “The aroma is moderately intense and led by a broad fruit family.”
  • “A second savoury note becomes clearer as the sample warms.”
  • “I am confident about the family, but not a precise descriptor.”
Taste

Which basic qualities are present?

  • “The wine is dry, with noticeable sourness and little obvious bitterness.”
  • “Fruit flavour fades before the structural sensations.”
  • “Sweetness is present but balanced by acidity.”
Feel

What happens through time?

  • “The palate feels medium-bodied and gently coating.”
  • “A fine drying texture develops along the gums.”
  • “Warmth appears late and persists in the throat.”
Overall

What does the pattern support?

  • “Several observations support this interpretation, but the glass does not prove it.”
  • “The strongest evidence is structural; the origin remains uncertain.”
  • “The line worth keeping is: Climate creates tendencies; variety, site, vintage, harvest, and cellar choices complicate them.”

Make the sentence earn its keep

Too loose

“It is fruity and smooth.”

More useful

“It has moderate fresh-fruit aroma, medium acidity, and a soft, low-grip texture.”

The stronger sentence identifies sensory channels and observable relationships.

Try it now

A five-minute field exercise

  1. Write one smell, taste, and texture sentence.
  2. Add the likely explanation on a separate line.
  3. Give the explanation a confidence level and name one alternative.
The line worth keeping

Climate creates tendencies; variety, site, vintage, harvest, and cellar choices complicate them.